Get Started
Back to Reports

EcoQuant vs Competitors

360° AI Visibility Analysis

EcoQuant
VS
Jacobs
VS
AECOM
VS
ERM
Google Gemini Environmental Technology/Ecology 46 Queries Analyzed February 2026
🏆

ERM Leads in AI Visibility

With 54.6% Share of Voice vs EcoQuant's 19.6%, ERM dominates AI visibility in this analysis with a 35.0 percentage point lead.

ERM
54.6%
Leader
EcoQuant
19.6%
AECOM
17.6%
Jacobs
15.7%
Room to Grow

Share of Voice

How often each brand is mentioned when AI assistants answer relevant queries.

Visibility Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of mention rates, citation rates, and primary recommendations across brands.

Share of Voice
19.6%
15.7%
17.6%
54.6%
Mention Rate
20%
20%
20%
63%
Citation Rate
20%
20%
20%
56%

Sentiment Analysis

How positively or negatively AI assistants describe each brand when responding to queries.

Neutral
Jacobs
Score in full report
Neutral
EcoQuant
Score in full report
Neutral
AECOM
Score in full report
Neutral
ERM
Score in full report

Detailed Metrics

Breakdown of visibility metrics including overall score, mention rate, citation rate, and primary recommendation rate.

Company Overall Score Mention Rate Citation Rate Primary Rec. Rate
EcoQuant
Low
Upgrade Upgrade Upgrade
Jacobs
Low
Upgrade Upgrade Upgrade
AECOM
Low
Upgrade Upgrade Upgrade
ERM
Good
Upgrade Upgrade Upgrade

Visibility Gaps Identified

16 gaps found
16
Visibility Gaps Detected

These are queries where competitors appear but you don't — each represents potential customers you're losing to competition.

6 informational6 recommendation4 transactional

ERM and Jacobs dominate these queries

Unlock full report to see exact gap queries and conquest opportunities

Visibility by Query Intent

Informational (9 queries)
11%
Low visibility
Transactional (8 queries)
0%
Low visibility
Comparison (11 queries)
46%
Opportunity area
Recommendation (9 queries)
0%
Low visibility

Competitive Positioning

Overall AI Visibility Ranking

🥇
ERM
Sentiment: 5.0/10
54.6%
Share of Voice
🥈
EcoQuant
Sentiment: 5.0/10
19.6%
Share of Voice
🥉
AECOM
Sentiment: 5.0/10
17.6%
Share of Voice
#4
Jacobs
Sentiment: 5.0/10
15.7%
Share of Voice

Head-to-Head Battles

EcoQuant
9
mentions
VS
Jacobs
9
mentions
🏆 Jacobs wins
EcoQuant
9
mentions
VS
AECOM
9
mentions
🏆 AECOM wins
EcoQuant
9
mentions
VS
ERM
29
mentions
🏆 ERM wins

Visibility by Query Type

Generic Industry Queries (5)
20%
Brand-Specific Queries (39)
18%
Comparison Queries (2)
50%

Query Performance Matrix

C Cited M Mentioned - Not Present Gap Opportunity

Query-by-query breakdown showing which brands appear in AI responses — C means cited as top recommendation, M means mentioned, Gap means competitors appear but you don't.

Query Intent PlatformEcoQuantJacobsAECOMERM
How can EcoQuant help me measure biodiversity in my restored wetlands? Informational GeminiC---
How does Industry's ecological monitoring compare to EcoQuant's? Comparison GeminiC---
Is EcoQuant better than Jacobs for monitoring carbon outcomes in rivers? Comparison GeminiCM-M
⚠️ Do I actually need an ecological impact assessment for my small construction project? Informational Gemini---C
What's the average cost of a Phase I environmental site assessment? Transactional Gemini----

Topic Analysis

9 topics analyzed

Visibility rate shows how often each brand appears when AI assistants answer queries on this topic. Rates are independent — multiple brands can appear in the same response, so percentages may not sum to 100%.

STRONG = You lead competitors. GAP = Competitors lead you. OPPORTUNITY = Low visibility across all brands — potential whitespace.

Comparisons

⚠ GAP
24 queries
EcoQuant 25%
Jacobs 25%
AECOM 21%
ERM 71%

Product Features

⚠ GAP
4 queries
EcoQuant 0%
Jacobs 0%
AECOM 25%
ERM 75%

Customer Service

⚠ GAP
4 queries
EcoQuant 25%
Jacobs 25%
AECOM 25%
ERM 50%

Reviews & Reputation

⚠ GAP
4 queries
EcoQuant 0%
Jacobs 25%
AECOM 50%
ERM 0%

Mobile & Digital

⚠ GAP
2 queries
EcoQuant 50%
Jacobs 50%
AECOM 0%
ERM 100%

General Info

⚠ GAP
2 queries
EcoQuant 50%
Jacobs 0%
AECOM 0%
ERM 100%

Account Opening

⚠ GAP
1 queries
EcoQuant 0%
Jacobs 0%
AECOM 0%
ERM 100%

Security & Trust

⚠ GAP
1 queries
EcoQuant 0%
Jacobs 0%
AECOM 0%
ERM 100%
+7 more topics in full report
0
Topics where you lead
8
Topics with gaps to close
1
Topics neutral/emerging

Priority Gap Topics

Focus your content on: Account Opening Security & Trust Product Features. Competitors are winning these conversations. Upgrade to reveal

Business Impact Analysis

Estimated business value of AI visibility based on market size, customer acquisition potential, and operational efficiency gains.

UK B2B software decisions/year
500K
AI-Influenced Decisions
35% AI-influenced B2B research
AI Search Growth (YoY)
35% YoY

AI assistants are becoming critical for software evaluation and selection

Untapped Customer Opportunity
2,858
potential customers/month via AI
With only 20% Share of Voice, competitors are capturing most AI-influenced customers. This shows your growth potential if visibility improves.
CAC Reduction Potential
£XXX
saved per customer
Upgrade to unlock
Competitive Position
Trailing
35.0% behind ERM
Your visibility: 19.6% Top competitor: 54.6%

Customer Journey Coverage

Discovery & Research
22%
Critical Gap
Comparison Shopping
46%
Needs Work
Final Selection
0%
Critical Gap
Ready to Switch
0%
Critical Gap
Recommendation: Focus on creating content for the "Final Selection" stage

Intent Coverage Analysis

26% High-Intent
💰 Buying
0.0%
0 of 8 queries
🤔 Comparing
45.5%
5 of 11 queries
🧭 Navigating
33.3%
3 of 9 queries
📚 Researching
11.1%
1 of 9 queries
Recommendations
0.0%
0 of 9 queries

Win/Loss Overview

Needs Improvement
9
Wins
37
Losses
0
Ties
Win Rate 19.6%
Analyzed 46 queries

Equivalent PPC Value

Annual Value
£88,704/yr
Monthly Value
£7,392/mo
Industry Avg CPC
£12
Based on 9 AI mentions × estimated click-through × industry CPC

Technical AEO Score

How well your website is optimized for AI crawlers and assistants — covering schema markup, content structure, and machine readability.

30
/100
🔴 Critical

Actively blocked

AI crawlers can't access or parse your content effectively

Visibility Impact
Up to 60%
Urgency
Immediate action required

Score Breakdown by Category

Upgrade to Unlock
Schema.org Markup
0/25
Performance & Accessibility
10/15
AI Meta Tags
5/20
AI Crawler Access
15/20
Content Structure
0/20

Detailed Audit Results

Upgrade to Unlock

Schema.org Markup

Organization Schema
Missing - AI can't confidently identify your brand
5 pts
FAQ Schema
Missing - reduces chance of verbatim quotes in AI responses
5 pts
Content Schema
Missing - AI struggles to categorize your content
5 pts
Breadcrumb Schema
Missing - AI can't understand your site hierarchy
5 pts
Speakable Schema
Missing - voice assistants can't identify quotable content
5 pts

Performance & Accessibility

Page Load Speed
Loaded in 3.50s - slow, crawlers may timeout
5 pts
Mobile Responsive
Mobile-friendly detected
5 pts
SSL/HTTPS
Secure (HTTPS)
5 pts

AI Meta Tags

AI Content Summary
Missing - AI creates its own interpretation of your content
5 pts
Platform-Specific Tags
Missing - no platform-specific optimization signals
5 pts
Robots AI Directives
Missing or restrictive - may limit AI access
5 pts
Open Graph Tags
Found 3/4 tags
5 pts

AI Crawler Access

GPTBot Access
Allowed
5 pts
ClaudeBot Access
Allowed
5 pts
PerplexityBot Access
Allowed
5 pts
llms.txt File
Missing - no AI-specific guidance file (emerging standard)
5 pts

Content Structure

Semantic Headings
Found H1: ✗, H2: ✗, H3: ✗
5 pts
FAQ Content
No FAQ content detected - add Q&A sections for better AI extraction
5 pts
Structured Lists/Tables
Lists: ✗, Tables: ✗
5 pts
Internal Linking
Found 0 internal links - add more internal links
5 pts

What does Technical AEO Score mean?

Technical AEO is necessary but not sufficient for AI visibility. A high score ensures AI assistants can access, understand, and attribute your content — but your content quality and authority determine if you actually win recommendations. Think of it like SEO: perfect technical setup removes barriers but doesn't guarantee rankings.

Strategic Recommendations

Prioritized actions to improve your visibility in AI assistant responses based on gap analysis and competitive positioning.

high

Address negative sentiment for EcoQuant

Sentiment score of 5.3/10 indicates issues. Review negative themes:

Improves brand perception and recommendations
2

Additional Strategic Recommendation

Detailed action plan for improving AI visibility...

High impact

+3 more recommendations

Upgrade to unlock

Unlock 15+ Premium Insights

You're viewing the free preview. The full report includes:

Exact visibility percentages
CAC reduction analysis
All platform breakdowns
Call deflection savings
Full gap query details
Product category visibility
All strategic recommendations
Technical AEO audit details
Get Full Report From £149 one-time

Want Your Own 360° AI Visibility Analysis?

Get comprehensive analysis of your brand vs competitors across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and more.