ERM Leads in AI Visibility
With 54.6% Share of Voice vs EcoQuant's 19.6%, ERM dominates AI visibility in this analysis with a 35.0 percentage point lead.
360° AI Visibility Analysis
How often each brand is mentioned when AI assistants answer relevant queries.
Side-by-side comparison of mention rates, citation rates, and primary recommendations across brands.
How positively or negatively AI assistants describe each brand when responding to queries.
Breakdown of visibility metrics including overall score, mention rate, citation rate, and primary recommendation rate.
| Company | Overall Score | Mention Rate | Citation Rate | Primary Rec. Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EcoQuant |
Low
|
Upgrade | Upgrade | Upgrade |
| Jacobs |
Low
|
Upgrade | Upgrade | Upgrade |
| AECOM |
Low
|
Upgrade | Upgrade | Upgrade |
| ERM |
Good
|
Upgrade | Upgrade | Upgrade |
These are queries where competitors appear but you don't — each represents potential customers you're losing to competition.
ERM and Jacobs dominate these queries
Unlock full report to see exact gap queries and conquest opportunities
Query-by-query breakdown showing which brands appear in AI responses — C means cited as top recommendation, M means mentioned, Gap means competitors appear but you don't.
| Query | Intent | Platform | EcoQuant | Jacobs | AECOM | ERM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| How can EcoQuant help me measure biodiversity in my restored wetlands? | Informational | Gemini | C | - | - | - |
| How does Industry's ecological monitoring compare to EcoQuant's? | Comparison | Gemini | C | - | - | - |
| Is EcoQuant better than Jacobs for monitoring carbon outcomes in rivers? | Comparison | Gemini | C | M | - | M |
| ⚠️ Do I actually need an ecological impact assessment for my small construction project? | Informational | Gemini | - | - | - | C |
| What's the average cost of a Phase I environmental site assessment? | Transactional | Gemini | - | - | - | - |
Visibility rate shows how often each brand appears when AI assistants answer queries on this topic. Rates are independent — multiple brands can appear in the same response, so percentages may not sum to 100%.
STRONG = You lead competitors. GAP = Competitors lead you. OPPORTUNITY = Low visibility across all brands — potential whitespace.
Focus your content on: Account Opening Security & Trust Product Features. Competitors are winning these conversations. Upgrade to reveal
Estimated business value of AI visibility based on market size, customer acquisition potential, and operational efficiency gains.
AI assistants are becoming critical for software evaluation and selection
How well your website is optimized for AI crawlers and assistants — covering schema markup, content structure, and machine readability.
AI crawlers can't access or parse your content effectively
Technical AEO is necessary but not sufficient for AI visibility. A high score ensures AI assistants can access, understand, and attribute your content — but your content quality and authority determine if you actually win recommendations. Think of it like SEO: perfect technical setup removes barriers but doesn't guarantee rankings.
Prioritized actions to improve your visibility in AI assistant responses based on gap analysis and competitive positioning.
Sentiment score of 5.3/10 indicates issues. Review negative themes:
Improves brand perception and recommendations